linux-kernel - Re: performance differences: "maxcpus=1" vs. "echo 0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:27:14 -0400
From:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:	Michael Meyer <mike65134@...oo.de>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: performance differences: "maxcpus=1" vs. "echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"

On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Michael Meyer wrote:
> 
> --- Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> schrieb:
> 
> > Luciano Rocha <luciano@...otux.com> writes:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:47:50PM +0100, Michael
> > Meyer wrote:
> > > > Hi, 
> > > > 
> > > > what is the difference between booting a dual
> > core
> > > > machine with "maxcpus=1" or by deactivating the
> > second
> > > > core at run time with "echo 0 >
> > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"?
> > > 
> > > maxcpus=1 should turn off the SMP alternative and
> > switch to UP only,
> > > optimising some locks and instructions.
> > 
> > CPU hot unplug will do the same. But it is unlikely
> > it accounts
> > for that much performance difference.
> > 
> > If he used maxcpus=0 it would make sense. maxcpus=0
> > disables
> > the IO-APIC which likely makes a large difference.
> > But it should
> > be actually slower.
> > 
> > There should be actually no difference in theory
> > between max_cpus=1
> > and hot unplug to one CPU. Might be some bug.
> 
> I had the following time values:
> 
> maxcpus=1:
> real	0m1.642s
> user	0m1.528s
> sys	0m0.068s
> 
> maxcpus=2 and 
> echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online:
> real	0m2.579s
> user	0m4.096s
> sys	0m0.160s

this above is the baseline, yes?
it is same as if you used no boot param
and did not touch the online file, yes?

> maxcpus=2 and
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online:
> real	0m3.757s
> user	0m3.632s
> sys	0m0.112s

Please post the contents of 
# grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/*
and also
grep . /proc/acpi/processor/*/power

My guess that the maxcpus=1 case benefits from turbo mode, aka EIDA.
That benefit, however, is subject to this bug:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5471
because for a single thread to run faster than the marketing MHz,
the other thread must be in deep-idle, which is prevented
by the bug above.

If your scaling_available_frequencies includes 2401000
then you probably have a turbo-mode enabled processor.

one way to verify this would be to disable turbo mode
by pegging the MHz like so:

# echo 2400000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq
# echo 2400000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq

-Len
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/