[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080325233356.GA2577@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:33:56 +0100
From: Sebastian Siewior <linux-crypto@...breakpoint.cc>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"Adam J. Richter" <adam@...drasil.com>,
Alexander Kjeldaas <astor@...t.no>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: remove crypto_fl_tab and replace
crypto_il_tab with isb_tab
* Huang, Ying | 2008-03-11 12:42:56 [+0800]:
>These changes reduce the encryption cache footprint to 50% and
>decryption cache footprint to 53.1%. The code size is increased
>slightly. On my Intel CORE micro-architecture CPU, there is almost no
>performance penalty.
According to the tcrypt numbers you've posted it is getting "slightly"
slower on encryption/decryption of 64+ bytes. How did you measure your
"almost no performance penalty"?
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists