linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] NR_CPUS: third reduction of NR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080326063401.GE18301@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:34:01 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] NR_CPUS: third reduction of NR_CPUS memory usage
	x86-version v2


* Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:

> Wii, isn't this fun...!  This is a resubmission of yesterday's patches 
> based on the x86.git/latest tree.  Yes, it _is_ a maze of twisty litle 
> passages. ;-)

just to make patch dependencies clear: most of the patches here can be 
applied to their base trees as-is, without depending on any other patch, 
correct?

the only undeclared dependency i found was the cpumask_scnprintf_len() 
patch - please prominently list dependencies in the changelog like this:

 [ this patch depends on "cpumask: Add cpumask_scnprintf_len function" ]

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/