linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/20] dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47EA3B83.4090403@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:03:15 -0300
From:	Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	glommer@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
	kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, amit.shah@...ranet.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/20] dma_ops for i386

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Glauber Costa wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Here there is a series of 20 patches that lays the foundations for
>> using dma_ops in i386 in the very same way x86_64, as well as many other
>> architectures already do.
>>
>> The functions themselves for i386 are placed in a pci-base_32.c, but just
>> a few among them are actually implemented. Most were no-ops anyway.
>>
>>   
> 
> I see the headers are unified, but the .c files are duplicated.  I 
> presume unifying the implementation is deferred to later patches?
presume correctly.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/