[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47EA75C7.7020506@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:11:51 -0700
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] x86_64: Cleanup non-smp usage of cpu maps v2
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
>
>> Cleanup references to the early cpu maps for the non-SMP configuration
>> and remove some functions called for SMP configurations only.
>
> thanks, applied.
>
> one observation:
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> extern int x86_cpu_to_node_map_init[];
>> extern void *x86_cpu_to_node_map_early_ptr;
>> +#else
>> +#define x86_cpu_to_node_map_early_ptr NULL
>> +#endif
>
> Right now all these early_ptrs are in essence open-coded "early
> per-cpu", right? But shouldnt we solve that in a much cleaner way: by
> explicitly adding an early-per-cpu types and accessors, and avoid all
> that #ifdeffery?
>
> Ingo
I was thinking of something similar but had to put it on the back
burner until we got to the point of being able to boot a kernel
with NR_CPUS set to 4096. It should pop back up on the priority
queue very soon... ;-)
Thanks!
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists