[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803260929350.27909@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: quicklists confuse meminfo
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who worked on this. By the way, I have asked Albert
> Calahan, the procps maintainer, to fix the free/top/vmstat tools such
> that these take recently added /proc/meminfo fields into account and
> display correct values on recent 2.6 kernels. See also
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9991 and
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=120496901605830&w=2.
Be aware that some distros have hacked their meminfo (proc and
/sys/devices/system/node/node*/meminfo) output to be more compatible with
recent 2.6 kernels but not updated to the new ZVC counter scheme. On those
kernels (<2.6.17) counters may show weird values and the sum of the per
node counters in sysfs may not yield the same amount shown in
/proc/meminfo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists