linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/12] cpumask: pass cpumask by reference to acpi-cpufreq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:15:54 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
To:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] cpumask: pass cpumask by reference to
	acpi-cpufreq

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:38:15PM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
 > Pass cpumask_t variables by reference in acpi-cpufreq functions.
 > 
 > Based on:
 > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
 > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git
 > 
 > Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
 > Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
 > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>

As this is dependant on non-cpufreq bits, I'm assuming this is going
via Ingo.  From a quick eyeball of this, and the change its dependant on,
it looks ok to me.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/