[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47EADBD0.6040400@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:27:12 +0300
From: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] PM: Introduce new top level suspend and hibernation
callbacks (rev. 4)
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This is the 4th revision of the patch.
> + * struct pm_noirq_ops - device PM callbacks executed with interrupts disabled
> + *
> + * The following callbacks included in 'struct pm_noirq_ops' are executed with
> + * the nonboot CPUs switched off and with interrupts disabled on the only
> + * functional CPU. They also are executed with the PM core list of devices
> + * locked, so they must NOT unregister any devices.
> + *
> + * @suspend_noirq: Complete the operations of ->suspend() by carrying out any
> + * actions required for suspending the device that need interrupts to be
> + * disabled
IMHO, no need to add _noirq in both struct and struct members.
pm_noirq->suspend_noirq does not look good...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists