[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080327181404.1e95a725.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:14:04 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Sudhir Kumar <skumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, taka@...inux.co.jp,
linux-mm@...ck.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][1/3] Add user interface for virtual address space control
(v2)
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:20:06 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> Add as_usage_in_bytes and as_limit_in_bytes interfaces. These provide
> control over the total address space that the processes combined together
> in the cgroup can grow upto. This functionality is analogous to
> the RLIMIT_AS function of the getrlimit(2) and setrlimit(2) calls.
> A as_res resource counter is added to the mem_cgroup structure. The
> as_res counter handles all the accounting associated with the virtual
> address space accounting and control of cgroups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
I wonder that it's better to create "rlimit cgroup" rather than enhancing
memory controller. (But I have no strong opinion.)
How do you think ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists