[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080327091810.GA32396@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:18:10 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
Cc: Dmitry <dbaryshkov@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hskinnemoen@...el.com,
domen.puncer@...argo.com, lethal@...ux-sh.org, tony@...mide.com,
paul@...an.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Clocklib: add generic framework for managing clocks.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:06:23AM +0100, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > + int users;
>
> Reference counting, probably need that too.
>
> > + unsigned long rate;
>
> This one is redundant. Use getrate() instead.
... which means a separate getrate() functions for every clock. Not really
practical for PXA.
> > + int delay;
>
> Huh? A delay after enabling the clock? Why can't the enable() hook do
> that if it's really necessary?
... which means a separate enable() function for each clock. The delay
there has not a lot to do with the actual register you're frobbing, but
the resy of the SoC. So, again, not really practical for PXA.
The result for PXA is a tradeoff between reducing the data size and
increasing the text size, or increasing the data size and keeping
the existing data size.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists