[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080327095803.GB15003@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:58:03 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>
Cc: ak@...e.de, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, markus.t.metzger@...il.com,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, roland@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
eranian@...glemail.com, "Villacis, Juan" <juan.villacis@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, ptrace: support pebs in ds.c and disable
ptraceand ds support
* Metzger, Markus T <markus.t.metzger@...el.com> wrote:
> > we could apply this if Roland Acks it - but i guess a precondition
> > for that is to not include more ptrace extensions and to also start
> > working on utrace support for it. Ptrace is something we want to
> > reduce usage of, not extend.
>
> The patch is not adding new features. It is merely re-establishing the
> state before the patch mysteriously disappeared from x86#testing.
well, Roland is the de-facto ptrace maintainer and he has NAK-ed the
current approach of extending ptrace, so i removed the patch. Is there
anything particularly wrong about doing this based on utrace? The API
will hit upstream in 2.6.26 or 2.6.27.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists