[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080327122255.GC2845@ami.dom.local>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:22:55 +0100
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, marcus@...ter.se,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10326] New: inconsistent lock state in
net_rx_action
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:56:19AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 02:18 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
> > I bet the net code is wrong and we missed it ;)
It looks like you are natural born winner! Congratulations!
> How about this:
>
> <irqs disabled>
>
> netpoll_poll()
> poll_napi()
> spin_trylock(&napi->poll_lock)
> poll_one_napi()
> napi->poll() := sky2_poll()
> napi_complete()
> local_irq_disable()
> local_irq_enable() <--- *BUG*
Yes! I missed it's unconditional here... Great catch!
On the other hand, still a question why lockdep doesn't see this
every day?
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists