[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440803270910q6602606aode3c355bf7947d32@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:10:37 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Gary Hade" <garyhade@...ibm.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"kernel list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/pci: add pci=skip_isa_align command lines.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel.send@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > [PATCH] x86/pci: add pci=skip_isa_align command lines.
> >
> > so we don't align the io port start address for pci cards.
> >
> > also move out dmi check out acpi.c, because it has nothing to do with
> > acpi. it could spare some calling when we have several peer root
> > buses.
>
> i like this feature, and i've applied your patch to x86.git for testing,
> but i'd like to hear what the ACPI and PCI guys think about this.
>
> Also, we should try as hard as possible to make it a blacklist instead
> of a whitelist? It would be cool to support more PCI cards/devices on
> all new(-ish) systems by default and if we didnt have to maintain the
> DMI whitelist for eternity. (a whitelist will always be incomplete and
> will lag behind reality)
yeah, blacklist is more good. that limitation is quite old...
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists