lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:44:08 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: jarkao2@...il.com Cc: marcus@...ter.se, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, rjw@...k.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10326] New: inconsistent lock state in net_rx_action From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:32:48 +0100 > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:59:02PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote: > > David Miller wrote: > >> Can some test if using local_irq_{save,restore}() in > >> napi_complete() cures this lockdep warning? > > Isn't it now justified enough without lockdep's ack? Absolutely, but I want to know that the problem is solved and confirmed by a tester. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists