linux-kernel - Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10326] New: inconsistent lock state in net_rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080327.144408.156087783.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jarkao2@...il.com
Cc:	marcus@...ter.se, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
	rjw@...k.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10326] New: inconsistent lock state in
 net_rx_action

From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:32:48 +0100

> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:59:02PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
> > David Miller wrote:
> >> Can some test if using local_irq_{save,restore}() in
> >> napi_complete() cures this lockdep warning?
> 
> Isn't it now justified enough without lockdep's ack?

Absolutely, but I want to know that the problem is solved
and confirmed by a tester.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/