linux-kernel - Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:53:03 -0400
From:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To:	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
CC:	Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>,
	Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@...ellique.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6

Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com> wrote:

>>  It means you shouldn't use dd as a benchmark.
> 
> If you want to benchmark write speed, you should add
> oflag=direct,dsync to the dd command line. For benchmarking read speed
> you should specify iflag=direct. Or, even better, you can use xdd with
> the flags -dio -processlock.
> 
No, you want your benchmark to measure performance doing what the 
application does. Do unless you have an application which has been 
heavily Linux-ized you don't want to measure something unrelated to the 
application requirements.

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/