linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] [NET]: uninline skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	joe@...ches.com
Cc:	ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	acme@...hat.com, mpm@...enic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] [NET]: uninline skb_put, de-bloats a lot

From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:10:50 -0700

> On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 14:38 +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > Allyesconfig (v2.6.24-mm1):
> 
> I think this change is only good in severely memory
> limited uses.  This will very likely negatively impact
> high speed networking.  It's a speed/size trade off.

I severely doubt this, the bulk of the overhead of
skb_put() is the atomic operation, not whether the
instructions get executed inline or not.

Please run some tests before making claims like this.
I might give you some slack in this area if you've
been doing networking performance tuning for 10+ years
but you haven't.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/