lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:41:30 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com> Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: bitops asm constraint fixes * Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com> wrote: > Please revert it for the time being, I've got a better version (i.e. > without extra dead code being generated) that I intended to submit > once I know whether the other issues pointed out in the description on > the original patch also should be adjusted. Of course, that could also > be done incrementally, but I would think overhauling the whole file at > once wouldn't be a bad thing... since it appears to cause no problems in x86.git (it passed a lot of testing already) i'd prefer to keep it (so that we can see any other side-effects of touching this code) - could you send your improvements as a delta against x86.git/latest? [or is there any outright bug caused by your changes that necessiates a revert?] Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists