| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:01:21 -0700 (PDT) From: david@...g.hm To: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca> cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rct@...s.com, jkosina@...e.cz, gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, pavel@...e.cz, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc7: Ugh. On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Mark Lord wrote: > David Miller wrote: >> From: rct@...s.com (Bob Tracy) >> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:42:58 -0500 (CDT) >> >>> I don't understand this claim. On what incredibly fast piece of iron >>> can you possibly do between 8 and 16 kernel builds (the range I've >>> encountered when I do the "git bisect" dance), boot each one, and >>> evaluate the results in so small a period of time? >> >> Builds are just over a minute on my box. I can do a full >> kernel build plus reboot cycle in under 2 minutes. > ... > > Well, lucky you. > > I have a box almost that quick here, too. > Except it's not the one with the problem. > > My main email/work machine is the one with the problem, > and the downtime is not affordable -- ie. it costs *me* personally money. not that it's relavent to the problem that you are troubleshooting (based on later messages), but I will point out that there is nothing wrong with useing a fast box to compile kernels for slower boxes. David Lang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists