[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080328195516.494edde3.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:55:16 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Sudhir Kumar <skumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, taka@...inux.co.jp,
linux-mm@...ck.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [-mm] Add an owner to the mm_struct (v2)
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:53:16 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> -static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_task(struct task_struct *p)
> +struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_task(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> return container_of(task_subsys_state(p, mem_cgroup_subsys_id),
> struct mem_cgroup, css);
> @@ -250,12 +250,17 @@ void mm_init_cgroup(struct mm_struct *mm
>
> mem = mem_cgroup_from_task(p);
> css_get(&mem->css);
> - mm->mem_cgroup = mem;
> }
>
> void mm_free_cgroup(struct mm_struct *mm)
> {
> - css_put(&mm->mem_cgroup->css);
> + struct mem_cgroup *mem;
> +
> + /*
> + * TODO: Should we assign mm->owner to NULL here?
> + */
> + mem = mem_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(mm->owner));
> + css_put(&mem->css);
> }
>
How about changing this css_get()/css_put() from accounting against mm_struct
to accouting against task_struct ?
It seems simpler way after this mm->owner change.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists