[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080328122655.GV3613@spacedout.fries.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:26:55 -0500
From: David Fries <david@...es.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Subject: [PATCH 21/35] W1: w1_io.c reset comments and msleep
w1_io.c 1.7
w1_reset_bus, added some comments about the timing and switched to
msleep for the later delay. I don't have the hardware to test the
sleep after reset change. The one wire doesn't have a timing requirement between commands so it is fine. I do have the USB hardware and it would be in big trouble with 10ms interrupt transfers
to find that the reset completed.
Signed-off-by: David Fries <david@...es.net>
---
drivers/w1/w1_io.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/w1/w1_io.c b/drivers/w1/w1_io.c
index 46c6994..9238758 100644
--- a/drivers/w1/w1_io.c
+++ b/drivers/w1/w1_io.c
@@ -291,12 +291,24 @@ int w1_reset_bus(struct w1_master *dev)
result = dev->bus_master->reset_bus(dev->bus_master->data) & 0x1;
else {
dev->bus_master->write_bit(dev->bus_master->data, 0);
+ /* minimum 480, max ? us
+ * be nice and sleep, except 18b20 spec lists 960us maximum,
+ * so until we can sleep with microsecond accuracy, spin.
+ * Feel free to come up with some other way to give up the
+ * cpu for such a short amount of time AND get it back in
+ * the maximum amount of time.
+ */
w1_delay(480);
dev->bus_master->write_bit(dev->bus_master->data, 1);
w1_delay(70);
result = dev->bus_master->read_bit(dev->bus_master->data) & 0x1;
- w1_delay(410);
+ /* minmum 70 (above) + 410 = 480 us
+ * There aren't any timing requirements between a reset and
+ * the following transactions. Sleeping is safe here.
+ */
+ /* w1_delay(410); min required time */
+ msleep(1);
}
return result;
--
1.4.4.4
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists