[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080328134413.GT29105@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:44:13 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, ying.huang@...el.com,
hpa@...or.com, andi@...stfloor.org, mingo@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86_64 boot -v2: Add linked listof struct setup_data to boot protocol
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 08:36:13AM -0500, Paul Jackson wrote:
> YH wrote:
> > interesting, that 512nodes/4096 box physics memory is not continuous?
>
> If each node board is stuffed with the same amount of RAM,
> and that amount of RAM is a power of two size, then you
There are likely per node memory holes too, right?
So even in that scenario it would be not continuous.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists