linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7]: uninline some net related static inline in .h bloaters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080327.175456.70727997.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7]: uninline some net related static inline in .h
 bloaters

From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:37:59 +0200

> As suggested by Andrew, I rerun the uninlining of all what's in .h
> (v2.6.25-rc2-mm1 this time) to fix the (un)likely profiling overhead
> which showed up in the allyesconfig results. The config was manually
> tweaked from allyesconfig to not include a number of debug related
> options [1]. Other setup: 32-bit x86, gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20070626
> (Red Hat 4.1.2-13). I also tweaked the uninlining machinery a bit and
> got even better coverage than last time.

I applied everything and will push to net-2.6.26 after some
build tests.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/