[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0803281714470.3781@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:18:11 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Venkatesch Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc7-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10153
> > > Subject : (regression) kernel/timeconst.h bugs with HZ=128
> > > Submitter : David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
> > > Date : 2008-02-26 19:32 (31 days old)
> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/26/294
> > > Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> > > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15114&action=view
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15115&action=view
> >
> > Have those patches made it somewhere else than into the bugzilla ?
>
> I don't think so.
They touch a bunch of files but they are pretty straight forward and
obvious. OTOH HZ=128 is not really anyway near to a default config and
I think we can safely postpone that one to .26
@hpa: can you please post them on LKML so they don't settle dust in
the bugzilla ?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists