[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47ED3357.7010608@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:05:11 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3 of 4] sparsemem: reduce i386 PAE section size
Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> Developers should probably learn the tradeoffs before they go start
> poking around in code and sending patches. ;)
>
I don't know any better way of learning the tradeoffs than by poking
around and sending patches ;)
> BTW, the current 1G sections were picked because all the hardware we
> knew of at the time had 512MB dimms that had to be added in pairs. So,
> we didn't ever have physical hotplug of less than that.
>
I guessed it was something like that. Even for my case 1G isn't too
bad. It was bad when I was trying to hotplug early and it was having
allocation failures in the bootmem allocator, but I think it should be
OK now. On the other hand, when you're hotplugging new memory is
precisely when you don't want to be allocating lots of new memory...
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists