| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <524f69650803281223v5e54e1c1na8a46da2e0a3df4c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:23:12 -0500 From: "Steve French" <smfrench@...il.com> To: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Can kmem_cache_free block? Is kmem_cache_free safe to call while holding a spinlock (can kmem_cache_free ever block or recurse into a file system)? I see it trying to grab just another spinlock which is probably fine (but was worried whether any of the worker functions called a sem) ... my assumption is that it would be safe, but the man page doesn't mention when it can be used safely. -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists