[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200803281314.53653.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:14:52 -0700
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jkosina@...e.cz,
gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, pavel@...e.cz,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc7: Ugh.
On Friday 28 March 2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > If we think that an approach is superior (which
> > your new RTC code certainly is), we have to take up the responsibility
> > of pushing that as a prominent, default choice and excluding the old
> > code. That ends up benefiting everyone, reduces complexity of the
> > kernel. You wont see anyone shed tears for the old code.
>
> Users with audio-related usage patterns do, as SND_RTCTIMER
> still depends on old rtc :-/
-ENOPATCH :)
Last time this specific issue came up, a related point was
that the relevant ALSA documentation in this area needed
updating too. ISTR it assumed there was only one kind of
RTC, and had a few other issues.
- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists