linux-kernel - Re: use of volatile in iounmap()?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:17:07 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: use of volatile in iounmap()?

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 09:34:28PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> While reviewing some CAN driver I stumbled on iounmap
> which has following prototype on x86:
> 
> extern void iounmap(volatile void __iomem *addr);
> 
> I argued that the driver should not use volatile
> but then I cannot explain why the argument to
> iounmap takes a volatile.
> 
> The same goes for many other functions in
> the io*.h headers.
> 
> Grepping the other archs they mostly follow
> same pattern.
> 
> Can anyone explain the rational for volatile in this case.

"Passing a pointer to volatile is allowed, along with passing pointers
to unqualified".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/