[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080330.001133.108307862.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 00:11:33 +0900 (JST)
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
To: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
marc.pignat@...s.ch, nforrester@...i.edu
Subject: [PATCH] atmel_spi: support zero length transfer (resend)
A spi transfer with zero length is not invalid. For example, such
transfer (len == 0 && delay_usecs != 0) can be used to achieve delay
before first CLK edge after chipselect assertion.
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
---
Though some discussion about zero length transfer were raised by this
patch last time, I think there were no explicit objection to this
patch itself.
diff --git a/drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c b/drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c
index 293b7ca..5dff5e0 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *msg)
return -ESHUTDOWN;
list_for_each_entry(xfer, &msg->transfers, transfer_list) {
- if (!(xfer->tx_buf || xfer->rx_buf)) {
+ if (!(xfer->tx_buf || xfer->rx_buf) && xfer->len) {
dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "missing rx or tx buf\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists