[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0803302201110.3219@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:10:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
cc: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...ius.com>,
linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: nobody cared about IRQ 19 (firewire, on a HP 2510p notebook)
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Stefan Richter wrote:
> I tend to believe it is a problem to be addressed in the x86 platform support,
> not a driver problem.
Depends. It might be unfixable.
> I Cc'd some random x86 folk... To rehash the issue:
>
> - Controller: Ricoh Co Ltd R5C832 IEEE 1394 Controller (rev 04)
> Board: PM965/GM965/GL960 based
> The R5C832 is known to work with ohci1394 according to
> http://hardware4linux.info/component/14348/ and other reports.
>
> - Martin also saw it happen with Linux 2.6.22.
>
> - firewire-ohci + firewire-core as well as ohci1394 + ieee1394
> appear to initialize the controller on Martin's laptop just fine.
> Among else this means that a number of register reads and writes
> succeed.
>
> - Some time later, without having actually used the FireWire
> controller, "irq 19: nobody cared"/ "Disabling IRQ #19" occurs.
> AFAIU the code, this is apparently because firewire-ohci's or
> ohci1394's IRQ handler was called repeatedly but got either 0 or ~0
> when reading the chip's interrupt event register.
Can we please have a full boot log (dmesg) and the output of /proc/interrupts and "lspci -vvv"
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists