lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200803310019.45219.chunkeey@web.de>
Date:	Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:19:44 +0200
From:	Chr <chunkeey@....de>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <andi-suse@...stfloor.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: The never ending BEEEEP/__smp_call_function_mask with 2.6.25-rc7

On Sunday 30 March 2008 23:36:40 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Chr wrote:
> > > > it's "hpet" (in both cases...)
> > >
> > > Hmm. That should be stable. Which clock is jumping back and forth ?
> > > The one in the logs or the system clock ?
> >
> > The one in the logs... (but it's because of the TSC, right?)
>
> Yes. I thought this was fixed already in Linus tree, but I might be
> wrong as usual.
>
> Anyway, that's not the real problem; I read your original post in
> meantime :)
>
> > Ever since I went to the new 2.6.25-rcX ...
>
> Did this problem start with 25-rc1 ? What is the latest version you
> tried ?
I had other problems with 25-rc1 as well.. but this one is now gone with
the dm-crypto update. I'll try rc1 tomorrow...
>
> > [ 5215.101875]  [<ffffffff80217d8f>] __smp_call_function_mask+0x90/0xc5
> > [ 5215.108493]  [<ffffffff8029b433>] invalidate_bh_lru+0x0/0x42
> > [ 5215.114422]  [<ffffffff8029b433>] invalidate_bh_lru+0x0/0x42
> > [ 5215.120348]  [<ffffffff8029b433>] invalidate_bh_lru+0x0/0x42
> > [ 5215.126276]  [<ffffffff80217e0d>] smp_call_function_mask+0x49/0x61
> > [ 5215.132723]  [<ffffffff8029b433>] invalidate_bh_lru+0x0/0x42
> > [ 5215.138649]  [<ffffffff802339a3>] on_each_cpu+0x10/0x2c
> > [ 5215.144135]  [<ffffffff8029fb4b>] kill_bdev+0x1e/0x33
> > [ 5215.149456]  [<ffffffff802a01da>] __blkdev_put+0x4f/0x128
> > [ 5215.155124]  [<ffffffff8027dd93>] __fput+0xa1/0x164
> > [ 5215.160272]  [<ffffffff8027b67d>] filp_close+0x5d/0x65
> > [ 5215.165679]  [<ffffffff80231072>] put_files_struct+0x66/0xc4
> > [ 5215.171607]  [<ffffffff802323ea>] do_exit+0x245/0x64c
> > [ 5215.176925]  [<ffffffff80238b94>] __dequeue_signal+0xff/0x159
> > [ 5215.182941]  [<ffffffff80232867>] do_group_exit+0x76/0x93
> > [ 5215.188606]  [<ffffffff8023a0fd>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x2b9/0x2e5
> > [ 5215.195141]  [<ffffffff8020a466>] do_notify_resume+0xaf/0x7e0
> > [ 5215.201155]  [<ffffffff80291414>] mntput_no_expire+0x1f/0x86
> > [ 5215.201155]  [<ffffffff80291414>] mntput_no_expire+0x1f/0x86
>
> You mentioned that you have tons of other logs. Can you please
> upload those to some place? If you don't have a possiblity, please
> contact me private and I'll provide you one.
>
http://www.file-upload.net/download-758265/logs.tar.bz2.html
and hit Download. ;-)

(BTW, the you can ignore some logs like freeze7, ... I tried
nolapic, but that doesn't play well with SATA?!)

Regards,
	Chr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ