[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440803301624r4601eae2g5bacc54f69c032db@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:24:29 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Jack Steiner" <steiner@....com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com> wrote:
> > > unsigned int get_apic_id(void)
> > > {
> > > - return (apic_read(APIC_ID) >> 24) & 0xFFu;
> > > + unsigned int id;
> > > +
> > > + preempt_disable();
> > > + id = apic_read(APIC_ID);
> > > + if (uv_system_type >= UV_X2APIC)
> > > + id |= __get_cpu_var(x2apic_extra_bits);
> > > + else
> > > + id = (id >> 24) & 0xFFu;;
> > > + preempt_enable();
> > > + return id;
> > >
> >
> > you can not shift id here.
> >
> > GET_APIC_ID will shift that again.
> >
> > you apic id will be 0 for all cpu
> >
>
> I think this is fixed in the patch that I submitted on Friday. I
> had to rework the GET_APIC_ID() changes because of the unification
> of -32 & -64 apic code. I think the new code is much cleaner...
i think Ingo already put you Friday's version in x86.git#latest.
that is wrong too with extra shift.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists