[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1206959743.3635.123.camel@quoit>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:35:43 +0100
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Cc: cluster-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] fs/gfs2: test for IS_ERR rather than 0
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 19:08 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
>
> The function gfs2_inode_lookup always returns either a valid pointer or a
> value made with ERR_PTR, so its result should be tested with IS_ERR, not
> with a test for 0.
>
Sorry for the delay - I've just got back from holiday. Its now in the
GFS2 -nmw git tree. Also I updated the tree to the latest Linus git tree
at the same time. Thanks,
Steve.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists