linux-kernel - RFC: Writing Solaris Device Drivers in Java

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47F0491F.4050804@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:14:55 +0800
From:	Peter Teoh <htmldeveloper@...il.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@...linux.org>
Subject: RFC:   Writing Solaris Device Drivers in Java

Interesting read:

http://research.sun.com/techrep/2006/smli_tr-2006-156.pdf

Personal comments:

Since KVM and Xen/OpenVZ etc other virtual machines are beginning to pop 
up - I don't see why it inhibits (in spite of the many initial 
difficulties as mentioned in the paper) the growth of using Java for 
device drivers development.   Contrast it against udev - esp in terms of 
usability/supportability/extensibility etc.   udev is a Linux thing, 
whereas Java is at industry level.   If everyone write applications 
device drivers using Java (minus the extreme hardware arch specific 
stuff, but supports all the low level protocol specific stuff like 
TCP/IP, NFS, USB etc) then I think it has potential to compete against C 
lang - the monopolizer till today in the kernel world 
(Windows/MacOS/Linux/BSD etc).   Ie, imagine using a drivers written for 
the Solaris in Linux, won't it be cool?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/