[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080331130106.GA15198@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:01:06 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86 TS_RESTORE_SIGMASK
* Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> wrote:
> Replace TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK with TS_RESTORE_SIGMASK and define our own
> set_restore_sigmask() function. This saves the costly SMP-safe
> set_bit operation, which we do not need for the sigmask flag since
> TIF_SIGPENDING always has to be set too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> include/asm-x86/thread_info_32.h | 13 +++++++++++--
> include/asm-x86/thread_info_64.h | 13 +++++++++++--
> 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
the x86 bits look nice - but i guess this all wants to go into 2.6.26
via -mm (or linux-next), due to its cross-arch nature?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists