linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86802c440803301923m29b6a0coca7f61975331cbe5@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:23:07 -0700
From:	"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To:	"Jack Steiner" <steiner@....com>
Cc:	"Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic

On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com> wrote:
> > >  Did you test it on non UV_X2APIC box?
>  >
>  > anyway the read_apic_id is totally wrong, even for your UV_X2APIC box.
>  > because id=apic_read(APIC_ID) will have apic_id at bits [31,24], and
>  > id |= __get_cpu_var(x2apic_extra_bits) is assuming that is on bits [5,0]
>  >
>  > so you even didn't test in your UV_X2APIC box!
>  >
>
>  It works fine on UV_X2APIX boxes because the double shift does
>  not occur. However, support for UV_X2APIC is dependent on
>  x2apic code that is not yet in the tree. Once the APIC
>  is switched into x2apic mode, the apicid is located in the LOW
>  bits of the apicid register, not the HIGH bits.

oh, so that will need have new version GET_APIC_ID too.

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/