[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0803311122040.14670@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Bj?rn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] evdev: Release eventual input device grabs when getting
disconnected
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> Greg, please look at the change again. Before kobject_put(kobj->parent)
> was done in kobject_cleanup() and so the parent would only be freed when
> all its children are gone. Now parent is deleted early, even if its
> children are still referenced by other users. This is lifetime rule
> change and should really be announced as such.
>
> If this change it intentional and is here to stay then I will just grab
> the references myself, although I wonder what else might be broken by
> it.
I do agree that this might want reverting, unless there is some rally good
reason for it. People may have pefectly valid reasons to expect topology
and reachability to remain valid - it's certainly what we guarantee in the
VFS code for similar rules (ie the parent of a dentry is only free'd after
all children have gone away).
Greg, is it possible to get the old lifetime rules back wrt his? They seem
valid and sane..
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists