linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] evdev: Release eventual input device grabs when getting disconnected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:46:07 +0200
From:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Bj?rn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] evdev: Release eventual input device grabs
	when	getting disconnected

On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 23:27 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > > Greg, please look at the change again. Before kobject_put(kobj->parent)
> > > was done in kobject_cleanup() and so the parent would only be freed when
> > > all its children are gone. Now parent is deleted early, even if its
> > > children are still referenced by other users. This is lifetime rule
> > > change and should really be announced as such.
> > Ugh, this was done because of scsi, they required that if you really
> > were deleting the parent, you wanted it gone.
> 
> What is the exact meaning of "gone" here please?

Gone means, that if you remove a device from sysfs, you drop the
implicit reference to the parent device, as this is no longer needed.

You are expected to keep a ref to the parent object (same way as to any
other used object) if you need to access the data. Removed objects are
isolated now, which means that you just pin their data and not their
parents.

This is the expected behavior and makes it possible to resolve refcount
loops (parent ref's child) which could not be released with the implicit
parent ref that was only released on object cleanup.

Thanks,
Kay

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/