linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 25/26] UBIFS: add debugging stuff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47F1FAAF.7030204@nokia.com>
Date:	Tue, 01 Apr 2008 12:04:47 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
CC:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...dex.ru>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 25/26] UBIFS: add debugging stuff

Pekka Enberg wrote:
> But they're totally different kind of thing! They're not for disabling
> hundreds of debug-only printks sprinkled around the kernel. Instead,
> they let you disable well-defined debugging checks for kernel speed
> and/or size optimizations. And btw, CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is only a kernel
> size optimization for CONFIG_EMBEDDED. The SLUB debugging code can be
> turned on and off at run-time.

Then I probably misunderstood you, sorry. My English is far from perfect.
Could you please again put your requests together and try to make each
request asking for a small thing. Probably be more specific about each
request (referring the code, saying why exactly this is harmful, etc).
It would just help a lot.

I thought you want us to remove all the UBIFS the debugging altogether.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/