linux-kernel - Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47F1FBCF.2090902@yandex.ru>
Date:	Tue, 01 Apr 2008 12:09:35 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...dex.ru>
To:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
CC:	Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...g.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
	ext-adrian.hunter@...ia.com, jwboyer@...il.com
Subject: Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system)

Jörn Engel wrote:
> About a year ago I would have used roughly the same argument.  But in
> the meanwhile I have accepted the fact that any piece of flash I'll use
> in a notebook in the next five years will likely use SATA or USB as a
> transport medium.

Well, Thomasz was talking not about the transport I believe. If you have a
raw flash access via SATA or USB, then this is handled on the driver level
and does not any require FS support. JFFS2 or UBIFS may also work with such a
device, because it is just raw flash. But I know that you know that most of
the FTL-enabled stuff does not give use raw flash access.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/