[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080401100050.009cec7b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:00:50 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, greg@...ah.com, m.kozlowski@...land.pl,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
Subject: Re: +
revert-gregkh-pci-pci-x86-use-generic-pci_enable_resources.patch added to
-mm tree
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 09:57:15 -0600 Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com> wrote:
> On Friday 28 March 2008 05:48:47 pm akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> >
> > The patch titled
> > revert gregkh-pci-pci-x86-use-generic-pci_enable_resources
> > has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
> > revert-gregkh-pci-pci-x86-use-generic-pci_enable_resources.patch
>
> OK, I'm not sure where we are with this. Ben listed arches where
> the generic pci_enable_resources() should be safe: x86, alpha, and
> powerpc. I think we should also include ia64, since I work on that.
>
> If there's no objection to those arches, how should we move forward?
> Since Andrew put in "revert gregkh-pci" patches rather than just
> dropping things, I assume the original patches are in Greg KH's tree.
>
> Can we just drop the "revert gregkh" patches for x86, alpha, powerpc,
> and ia64?
So powerpc is OK but ppc might not be?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists