linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] hugetlbfs: cleanup and new primitives for s390

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080401153102.09af4aca.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:31:02 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	schwidefsky@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu, davem@...emloft.net,
	tony.luck@...el.com, paulus@...ba.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	lethal@...ux-sh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] hugetlbfs: cleanup and new primitives for s390

On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:01:25 +0200
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com> wrote:

> this patchset cleans up hugetlbfs architecture headers and adds new
> primitives as preparation for the s390 large page support. Most notably
> we found that we need to add a new tlb flush for the copy-on-write of
> a large page (patch #2). We think that this is a bug, but obviously one
> that hasn't shown up so far on any of the other large page architectures.
> 
> As there were no objections so far, which would be the right tree for
> this to get it upstream?

-mm, I suppose.

But all the patcehs had the same title and I'd prefer to not have to
invent your patch titles for you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/