[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1207133344.8514.759.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:49:04 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: kmemcheck caught read from freed memory (cfq_free_io_context)
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 13:46 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > I am still confused.
> >
> > o The kmem_cache has SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU.
> >
> > o This means that a given slab should not be returned to the
> > system until a grace period elapses.
>
> Yeah, that's what I thought too, that this is a SLUB bug but Peter
> convinced me otherwise. SLUB keeps the _page_ around so the pointer
> will be _valid_, although it might not be _your_ pointer so the caller
> needs to do some validation step. Or at least that's how I understood
> what Peter was saying.
Correct, that is always how i understood SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU to work.
Does SLAB (as opposed to SLUB) do it differently?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists