[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1207134849.8514.775.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:14:09 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: kmemcheck caught read from freed memory (cfq_free_io_context)
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 14:11 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 13:07 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > Makes sense, and to me Pauls analysis of the code looks totally correct
> > > - there's no bug there, at least related to hlist traversal and
> > > kmem_cache_free(), since we are under rcu_read_lock() and thus hold off
> > > the grace for freeing.
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> > but what holds off the slab allocator re-issueing that same object and
> > someone else writing other stuff into it?
>
> Nothing. So you cannot access the object at all after you've called
> kmem_cache_free(). SLAB_RCU or no SLAB_RCU.
Well, you can, but you have to validate you get the object you were
looking for.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists