lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3cb76b010804011815l52e69576x9ddb97c07ab38111@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Apr 2008 21:15:52 -0400
From:	"Sapan Bhatia" <sapan.bhatia@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	daniel@...ac.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: race leading to held mutexes, inode_cache corruption

Hi,

We've been trying to investigate a file-system corruption issue in our
kernel (http://svn.planet-lab.org/browser/linux-2.6/trunk) that
manifests itself both with ext3 and ext2. It appears to be happening
to due a contamination of the inode cache (we spent some time
monitoring our systems to arrive at this hypothesis), and can be
reproduced on a vanilla kernel as well.

The race that leads to this issue involves a process being terminated
when it is waiting for a mutex in __mutex_lock_common. eg. when it is
sent a SIGKILL, and the mutex is unlocked, causing the process to be
woken up and sent to exit while now holding the lock.

The way it contaminates the inode_cache slab is that inode->i_mutex is
only initialized once, and assumes that inodes coming back into the
cache are initialized. It seems that in our case such poisoned inodes
were leaking out of pipe.c.

This (www.cs.princeton.edu/~sapanb/mut.c) is the module we used to
test the condition, as follows. Writing to the char device locks a
mutex and reading from it unlocks it.
# echo 1 > /dev/mut
# cat /etc/passwd > /dev/mut &
[2] 6232
# kill -9 6232
# cat /dev/mut
[2]-  Killed                  cat /etc/passwd > /dev/mut
# echo 1 > /dev/mut
(goes to sleep)

I suppose that one could also construct an attack to proactively
corrupt inode_cache, but I haven't tried that as yet.

Our base kernel is 2.6.22.19.

Thank you,
Sapan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ