[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080402122814.GF12774@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:28:15 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: kmemcheck caught read from freed memory (cfq_free_io_context)
On Wed, Apr 02 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 13:53 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > > Yeah, SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU should have a _HUGE_ comment explaining it,
> > > I'm sure this is not the first (nor the last) time people get that
> > > wrong.
> >
> > It should, SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU is definitely useful, but it is expected
> > to be an 'easier' way of doing the call_rcu() manually. So it definitely
> > needs more documentation.
> >
>
> Ok I gave it a go, how bad is this text?
I think it looks good. The key point is this:
"This delays freeing the SLAB page by a grace period, it does _NOT_ delay
object freeing."
which is right in the front of the text and with sample validation
below. So you can add my acked-by to that, if you want.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists