[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080402125819.GO12774@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:58:19 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kmemcheck caught read from freed memory (cfq_free_io_context)
On Wed, Apr 02 2008, Fabio Checconi wrote:
> > From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> > Date: Wed, Apr 02, 2008 02:36:39PM +0200
> >
> > > Looks good and tests fine as well. I've applied it, on top of the
> > > hlist_for_each_entry_safe_rcu() fix.
> > >
> > > http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commit;h=436151ad32b4a59e0d36165a7d6312545f126661
> > >
>
> ok, thanks. anyway I don't think the hlist_for_each_entry_safe_rcu()
> is needed at this point, since the pos->next pointer is still valid
> (at least) until the next rcu_read_unlock(). am I wrong?
it isn't, but it's still clearer. so either that or a nice comment, I
just stuck with what I had already committed.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists