[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47F2EC87.30205@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:16:39 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH -mm 0/3] cgroup: use hash table for css_set
When we attach a process to a different cgroup, the css_set linked-list
will be run through to find a suitable existing css_set to use. This
patch set uses a hash table for better performance.
As we add the hash table, we can totally remove the css_set linked-list.
When we have to run through the linked-list, we can run through the
hash table instead.
I tested the following benmarks:
For N in 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, create N cgroups with one sleeping
task in each, and then move an additional task through each cgroup in
turn.
Here is a test result:
N Loop orig - Time(s) hash - Time(s)
----------------------------------------------
1 10000 1.201231728 1.196311177
5 2000 1.065743872 1.040566424
10 1000 0.991054735 0.986876440
50 200 0.976554203 0.969608733
100 100 0.998504680 0.969218270
500 20 1.157347764 0.962602963
1000 10 1.619521852 1.085140172
Those patches are based on 2.6.25-rc5-mm1.
Regards,
Li Zefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists