linux-kernel - Re: kmemcheck caught read from freed memory (cfq_free_io

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:00:16 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kmemcheck caught read from freed memory (cfq_free_io_context)

On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 06:31:14PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02 2008, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 03:41:23PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 02 2008, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 02:58:19PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 02 2008, Fabio Checconi wrote:
> > > > > > > From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> > > > > > > Date: Wed, Apr 02, 2008 02:36:39PM +0200
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Looks good and tests fine as well. I've applied it, on top of the
> > > > > > > > hlist_for_each_entry_safe_rcu() fix.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commit;h=436151ad32b4a59e0d36165a7d6312545f126661
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ok, thanks.  anyway I don't think the hlist_for_each_entry_safe_rcu()
> > > > > > is needed at this point, since the pos->next pointer is still valid
> > > > > > (at least) until the next rcu_read_unlock().  am I wrong?
> > > > > 
> > > > > it isn't, but it's still clearer. so either that or a nice comment, I
> > > > > just stuck with what I had already committed.
> > > > 
> > > > Given Peter's comment, would you be willing to drop the
> > > > hlist_for_each_entry_safe_rcu()?  People tend to read too much into
> > > > the "safe" sometimes.  ;-)
> > > 
> > > Sure, let me rebase it... I already sent a pull request to Linus, and he
> > > just loves when I rebase and change the diffstats behind his back :)
> > 
> > Would it help if I submitted the patch to you to back it out later?  ;-)
> 
> Hehe, I already wrote to Linus and explained why it changed, so what is
> done is done :)

;-)

							Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/