[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab3f9b940804021045r28e88ce9vfddad5362ea6372d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:45:05 -0700
From: "Tom May" <tom@...may.com>
To: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:31 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Thank you very useful comment.
> that is very interesting.
>
>
> > I tried it with a real-world program that, among other things, mmaps
> > anonymous pages and touches them at a reasonable speed until it gets
> > notified via /dev/mem_notify, releases most of them with
> > madvise(MADV_DONTNEED), then loops to start the cycle again.
> >
> > What tends to happen is that I do indeed get notifications via
> > /dev/mem_notify when the kernel would like to be swapping, at which
> > point I free memory. But the notifications come at a time when the
> > kernel needs memory, and it gets the memory by discarding some Cached
> > or Mapped memory (I can see these decreasing in /proc/meminfo with
> > each notification). With each mmap/notify/madvise cycle the Cached
> > and Mapped memory gets smaller, until eventually while I'm touching
> > pages the kernel can't find enough memory and will either invoke the
> > OOM killer or return ENOMEM from syscalls. This is precisely the
> > situation I'm trying to avoid by using /dev/mem_notify.
>
> Could you send your test program?
Unfortunately, no, it's a Java Virtual Machine (which is a perfect
user of /dev/mem_notify since it can garbage collect on notification,
among other times).
But it should be possible to make a small program with the same
behavior; I'll do that.
> I can't reproduce that now, sorry.
>
>
>
> > The criterion of "notify when the kernel would like to swap" feels
> > correct, but in addition I seem to need something like "notify when
> > cached+mapped+free memory is getting low".
>
> Hmmm,
> I think this idea is only useful when userland process call
> madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) periodically.
Do you have a recommendation for freeing memory? I could maybe use
munmap/mmap, but that's not atomic and may be "worse" (more overhead,
etc.) than madvise(MADV_DONTNEED).
> but I hope improve my patch and solve your problem.
> if you don' mind, please help my testing ;)
It's my pleasure to help in any way I can.
.tom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists