[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1207162685.23161.217.camel@localhost>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:58:05 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 14:21 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 07:07:24PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 14:47 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > echo "add file.c" > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_printk/files
> > > > echo "remove file.c" > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_printk/files
> > I think this would be better by module rather than filename.
> > KBUILD_MODNAME would be a better choice.
> agreed. i think 'KBUILD_MODNAME" provides a better interface. The original
> implementation was using complete source pathnames, so they were unique. Are
> 'KBUILD_MODNAME's unique?
Yes, not by file, but by groups of compilation units
that make up a module. I think that's more sensible anyway.
I also have patches to pr_<level> that allow for dynamic
prefixing of KBUILD_MODNAME, __FUNCTION__, and __LINE__
that might be a useful addition to a facility such as yours.
These patches also make the kernel smaller by removing the
direct uses of __FILE__/__FUNCTION__/__func__ from pr_<level>.
I intend to post them during the next merge window.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists